If Christians ever ponder how Buddhists achieve spiritual enlightenment—what Jesus referred to as Heaven—without needing to declare that they accept Jesus. Despite attempts by some Christians to emphasize an ‘us versus them’ mentality over unity, there is significant overlap in both of their teachings.

Both faiths share similar paths to spiritual truth and awakening, provided Jesus’ teachings are faithfully followed—embracing peace, eschewing anger, hatred, judgment, revenge, and grudges.

Neither Jesus nor Buddha instructed their followers to worship them. Instead, both focused on guiding people towards spiritual fulfillment through virtue and spiritual practice, emphasizing connection with the divine or universal spirit for guidance.

Buddhism encourages adherents to embody what Jesus termed ‘peacemakers’—individuals consistently choosing peace over conflict. It should be noted that in the modern era, this also means applying this principle in both digital spaces and in real spaces.

No one particular faith can assert ownership over universal virtues shared across faiths. Our father (the universe) does not prioritize which spiritual label one applies on oneself on their path to truth; what matters is embodying virtues like compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and peace. Many Christians overlook the fact that Buddha’s teachings predate Jesus by about 500 years.

Key Overlaps Between Their Teachings Include:

Karma: Jesus recognized and taught the universal law of Karma, albeit using different terminology than Hinduism or Buddhism. His emphasis on turning the other cheek and performing acts of kindness reflects an understanding that positive or negative actions inevitably return to impact one’s life profoundly. This principle underscores his teachings on empathy, compassion, and forgiveness, emphasizing that these virtues yield reciprocal benefits.

In essence, Jesus incorporated the principles of Karma when instructing his followers to be generous and compassionate, particularly towards the less fortunate. Actions rooted in retaliation or kindness reverberate through one’s life—a concept universally acknowledged across faiths long before Jesus’ time.” It could be argued that many Buddhists are faithfully following Jesus’ teachings moreso than self proclaimed Christians that spread hatred and angry vitriolic/divisive rhetoric.

Hell – In Buddhism, suffering (dukkha) is recognized as inherent in human existence and can be transcended through the practice of the Four Noble Truths. These truths bear similarity to Jesus’ teachings in the Sermon on the Mount. It’s plausible that what Jesus describes as Hell corresponds to the human suffering acknowledged in Buddhism and Hinduism. Both traditions propose that suffering can be overcome during one’s lifetime, contrasting with the Christian misconception that Heaven is in the afterlife. By adhering to the Four Noble Truths or Jesus’ teachings in the Beatitudes, individuals can effectively transcend the suffering referred to as Hell or Dukkha in their respective religions.

Compassion and Love

  • Demonstrating Empathy and Loving They Neighbor
  • Loving Your Enemies
  • Humility & Servitude
    • Humility demonstrating a total relinquishment of one’s ego. Putting others before yourself is the ultimate demonstration of being selfless and casting your ego aside. Letting go of attachment to your identity and our separation from others and the universe is crucial towards this end.
  • Non Attachment
    • Buddhism is well known for encouraging non-attachment, and Jesus was no different. He articulates this in his metaphor of the Camel through the Eye of A Needle, how attachments to wealth will make one’s spiritual journey incredibly difficult. He prioritizes spiritual growth over material wealth as well.
  • Forgiveness/Reconciliation
    • Both Jesus and Buddhism implore that people forgive to attain spiritual peace. Forgiveness is synonymous with Jesus, but Buddhism also shares this virtue. Forgiveness is one of the most devastating blows to your ego that you can make, as well as demonstrating the ability to choose the path of peace instead of conflict/resentment which is one of the critical steps in attaining spiritual enlightenment.
  • Inner Transformation/Ethics
    • Both faiths push/encourage universal ethics and virtues. Honesty, Purity, Righteousness, Mercy, Honesty, Integrity, Giving to needy, Demonstrating Humility, Seeking peace rather than Conflict & Anger, Avoiding Judgements of Others

Considering the significant overlap in values and virtues between the teachings of both faiths, it becomes clear why both paths can lead to spiritual enlightenment or awakening, akin to what Jesus referred to as Heaven. When individuals who claim to follow Jesus consistently violate these virtues and lessons, they are merely followers of Jesus in name only.

Sign up to awaken from the dream

effectively use spiritual practices to actually awaken from the dream

theyknew

4 responses to “Jesus and Buddha: Shared Truths, Common Ground”

  1. inspiringquickly6cdf47ec04 Avatar
    inspiringquickly6cdf47ec04

    Greetings,
    Did AI write your opening sentance? It seems a disjointed thought.

    Your written thoughts provide for consideration of man’s way to get to God and God’s way to get to Him. In my understanding, the Budda acheived nirvana but left there because there were so few souls. If so, then what good does it do to use his techniques/system/path when there is so little hope? I agree the outward manifestations are worthy (peace, love, charity, etc) however, God’s way provides these outcomes with the added benefit of including potentially all of us. In my pea brain way of thinking, following Jesus demonstrates a closer relationship to our Creator than what we can attain on our own.

    I respect what you are posting and will continue to read your thoughts.

    Regards,

    Jim

  2. Hey Jim, thanks for reaching out and offering your commentary, it’s always welcomed. I’ve been trying to fix a bug that was affecting the front page of my site, but now that it’s out of the way I can finally respond. I wish I could blame any disjointed writing on AI, but that’s really more of a weakness in my own writing and a failure to proofread effectively.

    You raise an interesting point. The lack of souls might actually be more of an indictment of humanity not successfully transitioning into the higher state of consciousness that Jesus and Buddhism were trying to help people arrive at. I think if people truly followed what Jesus and Buddhism were teaching, it would be a tremendously unlonely place. But that goes back to a point I’ve made elsewhere on the blog: fewer and fewer Christians seem to be experiencing the end goal of what Jesus was teaching because, for the most part, his teachings have been overlooked in favor of corrupted iterations of his teachings.

    I always get different answers when I ask Christians this, but how does a Christian define or measure closeness with God? When a Christian says they feel very close to God, I’d genuinely love to know what the key indicators are that make them feel that way.

  3. inspiringquickly6cdf47ec04 Avatar
    inspiringquickly6cdf47ec04

    Greetings,
    Thank you for the reply. You might have a similar concept that I maintain, in the that the early Church (before Constantine) was closer to Jesus’ teachings than what we’ve followed for the last 1700 years.

    As an aside, the Apostle Thomas went to India and preached there, starting a following of believers that are today called the Church of Thomas, anecdotal for sure but thats a tentative connection to what Thomas may have encountered in India.
    I struggle with the Lord regularly regarding Cephas (Peter) perhaps more closely following his blue-collar ways in what he taught the Constantine having all the power influenced desires allowed the Church to get started on a more secular (or universal) footing than what Jesus intended.

    Lastly, your next post on how Jesus nullified the concept of a chosen people then bringing up Israeli events in Gaza caught me completely off guard and I unsubscribed from your postings. Later that evening the Lord encouraged me to offer rebuttal. By responding to my original comment, I have been encouraged by tee Lord to continue our conversation.

    Please remember the Hebrews have gone through 5 separate covenants with YHWH. I take strong exception to your statement that Yeshua nullified the concept of YHWH’s chosen people. God has always completed His part of the covenants with Yeshua as proof. Please consider also that YHWH knows us from the foundation of the world, meaning we are chosen too. Another aside would be found in Deuteronomy where the Lord says “Think not that I chose you because you were the best, I chose you because you were the only ones willing to follow me” and (I’m gonna bother this one) “…circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart…”

    Lastly, Your inclusion of atrocities in Gaza attributed to the Israeli’s without including the Hamas atrocities is so very biased and can be understood as woke support, certainly not fitting for a follower of Jesus/Yeshua.

    Regards,

    Jim

    1. Jim, it’s good to hear from you again. It’s been a couple of weeks, but your comment ultimately inspired me to expand upon the article you criticized, the same article that prompted you to unsubscribe. I’ll include that expansion further down below. To be honest, it probably would have made more sense to leave your comment on the original post you were criticizing for increased visibility, but I appreciate that it prompted me to reconsider and expand upon my argument.

      It should also be acknowledged that Israel is not an innocent actor in these conflicts. The killing of innocent civilians and other alleged violations of international humanitarian law deserve condemnation, regardless of who commits them. War inevitably carries the tragic risk of civilian casualties, but the deliberate targeting or killing of civilians should never be treated as an inevitable consequence of war. We, perhaps more than anyone, should understand that distinction after 9/11. I would love to hear how a Christian can reconcile the endorsement or indifference to war crimes with their religious affiliation with Jesus.

      Whether such atrocities are committed by Israel, Hamas, or other actors in the region, they should be condemned and discouraged on the same moral and legal grounds. The identity, religion, or nationality of the perpetrator should not determine whether we consider the act unacceptable.

      The article was moreso highlighting the awful justifications for wars against humanity which would not be tolerated or accepted under anyone adopting the teachings of Jesus. That said, I’ll paste my expansion to the article below:

      I believe it is impossible for someone who earnestly embraces the teachings of Jesus to also maintain the idea that one group of people is uniquely preferred by God. The very concept of a “chosen people,” when interpreted to mean that God favors one ethnic or religious group above others, undermines the idea that God loves all people equally.

      Anyone who has genuinely adopted the teachings of Jesus should have difficulty reconciling such a hierarchy with his message. Jesus repeatedly broke through tribal, ethnic, religious, and social boundaries, teaching people to recognize one another as brothers and sisters under one Father. That vision points toward unity, not a divine ranking of human beings in which one group occupies a privileged position in God’s eyes.

      The insistence on preserving this interpretation of “chosen people” seems to me largely an attempt to uphold an Old Testament framework that should instead be examined critically in light of what Jesus taught. The notion that one group is inherently preferred over another also perpetuates tribalism, the deeply cancerous human tendency to divide ourselves into “us” and “them,” to separate rather than unite, and to elevate our own group above others. These impulses are products of the ego and its constant need for identity, separation, and superiority.

      For those who fear that rejecting the idea of Jewish people as uniquely favored by God will somehow earn them eternal punishment, I would argue that you are on much firmer spiritual ground loving all of your brothers and sisters equally than constructing a hierarchy in which some are closer to God by virtue of their ancestry. The moment “chosen” is understood to mean preferred, everyone outside that category is implicitly placed beneath it. Even when that judgment is never spoken aloud, the hierarchy remains built into the belief itself.

      And these ideas do not remain confined to theology. Religious beliefs about divine preference can influence how people understand nations, political conflicts, and even warfare. Once we convince ourselves that God has elevated one people above another, it becomes dangerously easy to view political allegiance as a sacred obligation and violence as divinely justified.

      If God is truly the Father of us all, then there can ultimately be no superior people and no inferior people, only brothers and sisters. The path Jesus taught leads away from tribalism and separation and toward precisely that recognition of our shared humanity.

Leave a Reply

Trending

Translate »

Discover more from Actual Christianity

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading